requestId:684c3e4f956963.37162017.
The meaning of “The Book of Changes” and phenomenon on the reconstruction of philosophy
Author: Huang Yusong
Source: The author authorized the Confucian network to publish, originally published by “International Confucianism Forum”, the 2021 edition of Social Sciences Library
[Abstract] For the reconstruction of philosophy, the “The Book of Changes” and phenomenon have the main meaning of expression. The ordinary way of phenomenon can be combined into three steps: solution, restoration, and construction. For the Book of Changes, it is: the concept of the sensory metaphysics and the metaphysics of “Yi Ji” and the materialistic ones; the concept of the divine metaphysics of “Yi Ji”; and even the concept of the existence of the predecessors of “Yi Ji”. Constructing, in accordance with the concept of Confucianism in life, is actually an inverse process, that is, from the perspective of our current preexist beings, reconstruct the metaphysics of philosophy (including divine metaphysics), and then reconstruct the metaphysics – knowledge theory and ethics.
I plan to write an article seriously, and the important thing is to discuss the problem of philosophical reconstruction through the “Book of Changes” and phenomenon. The following is the opening of the article:
The phenomenon after Huthier often echoes modern thoughts, and it seems to be inclined toward philosophy. For example, Heidegger announced the “final end of philosophy” [1], so there was Roty’s “post-philosophical civilization”, Habermas’ “post-metaphysical thinking” [2], etc. But what is interesting is that philosophy still exists and develops. In fact, Heidegger’s own double-founded thoughts have already darkly embraced the meaning of laying the theory of existence, that is, rebuilding philosophy[3]. I have talked about this point [4]. This type of white man seems to always require philosophical metaphysics, or perhaps some kind of “into-orthodox commitment” [5]. So the question is no longer whether philosophy can be required, but how to reconstruct philosophy wraps up the cat: “Give it to me.” In this question, what kind of inspiration can the “Book of Changes” and phenomenon study give us? [6]
The main section of this article is darkening Ye’s reputation and embarking on the road of celebrities step by step. In the end, the entertainment topic is the problem of concentrated thinking about the reconstruction of philosophy. From the perspective of the entire history of philosophy, philosophy has always been reconstructed; now the “final end of philosophy” has been announced, but philosophy is still reconstructing.
1.Regarding the “Photomology Learning Method” problem
The first part of the article is about the number of replications and number of replications of “Photomology”, I would like to express my thoughts. The important thing about the “single number” and “recovery” of phenomenon is to make a included in this way:
(I) The so-called “recovery phenomenon” is simply called “recovery philosophy”.
For example, Spiegelberg’s book “Photomotive Sports” [Baohua Network VIP7] lists several schools, and he also traces Husser’s previous phenomenon. After Huthier, he talked about Max Scheler’s phenomenon, Nicolai Hartmanbasketball pricen), Heidegger’s phenomenon, Gabriel Marcel’s phenomenon, Jean-Paul SaBaobao.comrtre)’s phenomenon, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenon, Paul Ricoeur’s phenomenon, Emmanuel Levinas’s phenomenon, and so on. In the morning, some students also mentioned other phenomenonists. These are the so-called “phenomenological philosophies”, which present a lot of philosophical structures. The name “philosophy” here is no longer the final concept of “philosophy” as Heidegger; it is like Heidegger’s “thinking”, in fact, the masters also call it “Heidegger’s philosophy”.
From these many graphic philosophy, we will find that although they can actually be said to be very different and the difference is very large, they can still be called a certain “morphology”. The reason why this is so easy to see is that they all adopt a certain degree of coordination, approach or method, which is the “morphology method”.
(II) I focused on the above discussion of “the phenomenon of single numbers”, which is the so-called “physical learning method”.
As for what the phenomenon is, the opinions of each school are also different. I started with a speech taught by Sun Dexing, the head of the website of the bride. He has a saying in the “Editor’s Quote” of the Chinese text “Heidegger Selection”, which says that there are three basic links in the way of phenomenon, that is, three steps: the first is “Reduktion of phenomenon”, the second is “Konstruktion of phenomenon”, and the third is “Destruktion of phenomenon”. [8]
I remember it was in 2004, when I proposed “Career Confucianism” [9], and the first article “The Introduction to Career Confucianism”” specifically explored this problem. [10] I adjusted the sequence taught by Sun Zhou Xingqing, and understood the phenomenon as three major steps: Baojia ClubThe first is to solve the structure, which I call “cracking”; the second is to restore, which I call “retrieval”; the third is to construct, which I call “construction”.
The first step is the solution (deconstruction). In this article, I mentioned the above-mentioned inclusive solution. What is important to touch on is the most basic attitude of phenomenon, which is “Voraussetzungslosigkeit”, which means eliminating all achievements in traditional philosophy. This is a common goal of phenomenon philosophy.
The second step is reduction. What the restoration corresponds to is a famous vocabulary in the study of phenomena, that is, “to work yourself” (zu den Sachen selbt). The reason why phenomenon is a different philosophy is because although teachers have restored themselves to the point of doing things, in fact, philosophers who are different in science movements have different understandings about their work. For example, we understand that the working self that the founder Husser knew was the so-called intentionality of consciousness. And in Heidegger, working yourself is the existence of this place (Dasein). This is to understand the differences between work. But no matter how you talk, there is a coordinated step, that is, to restore to a certain “original experience” through the solution. But Heidegger’s “experience”This word is not good, and Huthier definitely won’t work. This is the problem of restoration.
The third step is construction. This is a question I want to talk about. To date, we have seen that, whether at home or abroad, when talking about phenomenon, the masters have both explicitly or secretly held a post-modern theory and a state of interpretation, and have ignored the constructiveness of phenomenon. People will regard a certain philosophical exploration of phenomenon only as a solution – a restoration, that is, only to return to a certain true state or original experience, without touching and constructing problems. I think this is a misunderstanding.
Of course, it is not denied that some phenomenonists do have such a tendency. But in fact, according to my understanding, I mentioned just now that Heidegger has an expression in “Existence and Time”, which I call “double laid”, which is constructive. When he talked about science as a sub-science, frankly said that if the traditional existence theory was to be laid for the sub-science that included science, then the traditional existence theory itself was still to be laid; he believed that in his thinking, what laid the traditional existence theory was his “fundamentalontologie”, which was his preservation analysis. [11] This is what I call Heidegger’s double-developed thoughts.
The master generally ignores this point, that is, Heidegger’s dual-founded thinking actually contains an extremely constructive ability. Not to mention my career Confucianism, even if we stand on Heidegger’s stand and use the “preservation” of “this place” to lay the foundation for the traditional existence, that is, to answer a question that existed in Kant – the question of “why can subjectivity be sufficient”, then when we are doing this work, we have actually moved towards, or perhaps pointed to the construction of a new existence theory.
The third step in the phenomenon learning method, that is, the problem of construction, is the key concept of “Xi Xi suddenly realized that he had met an unexpected benefactor (and lover): laid out.” The concept of “laid” comes strictly and was first passed down from Kant; but we unde
發佈留言